Banks Brace for New Citizenship Data Requirements Under Executive Order

John NadaBy John Nada·Apr 15, 2026·4 min read
Banks Brace for New Citizenship Data Requirements Under Executive Order

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pushes for banks to collect citizenship data, linking immigration policy with banking regulations, raising significant compliance concerns.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is signaling a significant shift in banking regulations, urging banks to prepare for mandatory collection of citizenship data from customers. Bessent emphasized that if the Treasury and banking regulators deem it necessary, banks must comply, underscoring the government's tightening grip on the financial system.

This initiative comes as part of a broader effort under President Donald Trump to link immigration policy with various domestic processes, including banking, voting, and Census activities. The proposed executive order (EO) has been in discussion for months and is reportedly moving closer to implementation, as Bessent confirmed its ongoing development. The measures outlined in the EO reflect a notable evolution in the government's stance on immigration and its intersection with financial regulation, aiming to create a comprehensive framework that mandates stricter oversight of who can access banking services.

Currently, U.S. banks are not required to collect citizenship documentation to open accounts, operating under "Know Your Customer" regulations aimed at combating financial crime. These rules focus on identity verification, risk assessment, and transaction monitoring. However, Bessent argues that this system fails to adequately identify the legal status of account holders, questioning how banks can truly know their customers without citizenship data. He pointed out that other countries typically mandate this information for banking access, suggesting a need for stricter U.S. regulations to align with international practices.

Support from Republican lawmakers is evident, with Senator Tom Cotton advocating for legislation requiring banks to verify that account holders are either U.S. citizens, permanent residents, or legally present in the country. Cotton has urged the Treasury to revisit existing rules that allow undocumented immigrants access to financial services, highlighting the political momentum behind this initiative. This push from lawmakers reflects a broader strategy to address concerns over immigration and its perceived impact on national security and economic stability.

While Bessent and others advocate for these changes, there are substantial concerns regarding their potential economic impact. Some policy experts and financial institutions warn of the repercussions if individuals are barred from the banking system. Increased administrative burdens could arise, with estimates suggesting that compliance with new citizenship verification requirements could lead to billions in costs and millions of additional paperwork hours for banks. The American Action Forum has estimated that the implementation of citizenship verification could add anywhere from 30 million to 70 million paperwork hours, with compliance costs ranging from $2.6 billion to $5.6 billion. This staggering figure highlights the administrative challenges banks could face in adapting to the new requirements.

Moreover, excluding non-citizens from banking access could exacerbate economic inequality. Individuals without banking services are often relegated to a cash-based economy, limiting their financial mobility and contributions to economic growth. Being unbanked is frequently associated with reduced ability to move up the social ladder, as such individuals miss out on the benefits of financial products that facilitate savings and investment. The American Action Forum cautioned that the total costs of implementing citizenship verification could be significantly higher than anticipated, especially as the implications for existing account holders remain unclear. This could lead to a situation where those who are currently banked may have to navigate new verification processes that could disrupt their access to banking services.

Bessent's insistence that illegal immigrants should not have access to banking signals a potential restructuring of the financial landscape. "Why can unknown foreign nationals come and open a bank account?" he posed rhetorically, emphasizing the perceived deficiencies in current banking regulations. As this initiative progresses, it will be crucial to monitor how banks adapt to these regulatory changes and the broader consequences for financial inclusion and economic activity in the U.S.

This evolving policy approach reflects a growing intersection of immigration and financial regulation, challenging banks to adapt to new compliance requirements. The implications extend beyond operational challenges; they could reshape the landscape of who can participate in the financial system and how economic growth is fostered in the future. The push for stricter citizenship verification comes at a time when financial institutions are already grappling with the complexities of regulatory compliance and the need to balance security with customer service.

As the conversation around citizenship data collection unfolds, it is essential for stakeholders to consider the broader implications of these policies on economic growth, social mobility, and the overall inclusivity of the financial system. The delicate balance between regulatory compliance and fostering an accessible banking environment will undoubtedly be a focal point of discussion in the months ahead, as banks and policymakers navigate the intricacies of this significant regulatory shift.

Scroll to load more articles